May 20, 2006

Briefly: Cancer roundup; "animal rights;" biotech acquisitions

I sympathize with the plight of animals; I really do. I am an animal lover, and I've had pets all of my life, most of whom were/are treated as members of the family. However it is simply impossible to do medical research without experimenting on animals. It is far better for a lab rat to die in the name of medical research than it is for a human. I don't know of many

I certainly do not approve of abusing animals for fun or any other reason, but the acts of fringe "animal rights" crazies are despicable, and if the world was run their way, we'd all be dead of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, or AIDS — if we got lucky enough to make it through childhood. Humans are able to have the quality of life that we enjoy in the first world because of medical science — most of which is built on animal research. I would suffer a rat to die much sooner than a human, as would any other sane person.

[tags]Animal rights, GSK, GlaxoSmithKline, biotech, Medarex, Pfizer, cancer, oncology, medicine[/tags]

| 6:22 am |

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI
You can also bookmark this on del.icio.us or check the cosmos

Leave a comment

XHTML ( You can use these tags): <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .