Merck's cancer vaccine approved
I mentioned back on May 17 how the FDA was scheduled to make a decision on Merck's new HPV vaccine, Gardasil, by June 8. The FDA handed down their approval today, a decision which is no surprise to anyone, since it's 100% effective against one strain of HPV, and 99% effective against two others. The vaccine is a huge boon for the public, and also for the beleaguered Merck:
This cancer kills 3,700 women each year in the United States and hundreds of thousands more worldwide.
[...]
Gardasil, manufactured by Merck & Co. Inc., protects against the two types of HPV responsible for about 70 percent of cervical cancer cases. The vaccine also blocks infection by two other strains responsible for 90 percent of genital wart cases. It will be available by the end of June.
It is likely that Merck will market Gardasil as a cancer vaccine rather than an STD vaccine for political reasons. There has been some speculation that the religious right would opposed the vaccine if they thought that it would lead to premarital and/or teenage sex. To combat this, Merck launched their "tell someone" anti-HPV campaign several months ago to soften the social impact of the drug before the approval was granted. I'm sure we'll see Merck tie a new marketing campaign for Gardasil into this tell someone HPV campaign to allow a smooth transition from one to the other — despite their assertions to the contrary. Even if a direct connection between Gardasil and the tell someone campaign isn't made, Gardasil is currently the only vaccine approved to prevent HPV, so a woman asking about her doc about HPV prevention is almost akin to her asking for Gardasil — even if she doesn't know it. (Not that this is necessarily a bad thing.)
In any event, this is great news for everyone in the first world and the third. Hopefully this will mean that HPV-induced cervical cancer will finally go the way of polio. This is some of the biggest cancer news in a week already chock-full of cancer breakthroughs.
[tags]Medicine, pharmacy, Gardasil, HPV, genital warts, STDs, cancer, oncology, Merck, vaccine, cancer vaccine[/tags]
7 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post.
| TrackBack URI
You can also bookmark
this on del.icio.us or check the cosmos
[...] References – Gardasil, WebMD FAQ, OnThePharm Genital HPV infection – CDC fact sheet Patient Fact sheet [...]
Pingback by Medicine and Man » Blog Archive » Gardasil - Vaccine for Cervical Cancer — June 8, 2006 @ 9:18 pm
[...] With the approval of Gardasil, and the pending approval of Cervarix, major progress can be made against cervical cancer, especially in the third world. Enter the Gates Foundation — one of my favorite charities. As a first step, PATH plans a program of research in India, Peru, Uganda and Vietnam, with a $27.8 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, studying the best way to use the vaccines. [...]
Pingback by OnThePharm » The Gates Foundation will support the new HPV vaccines — June 10, 2006 @ 6:07 pm
[...] So far we've got cervical cancer vaccines, vaccines for otitis media, and a shingles vaccine. That's a lot of happenings in a field of medical research that has long lay dormant. [...]
Pingback by OnThePharm » Alzheimers vaccine showing promise — June 13, 2006 @ 8:04 pm
[...] There's a story at TheStreet.com from yesterday about Merck's new vaccine, Gardasil. It suggests that unless the vaccine gets endorsement from ACIP, it's not going to be the blockbuster that everyone thinks it will be. On June 29, Gardasil goes before the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice which consists primarily of experts in public health, infectious diseases and pediatric care. Although states have the ultimate say in what vaccines are required of school-aged children, the ACIP's opinion carries considerable influence in the public health arena for vaccinating children and adults. [...]
Pingback by An uphill fight for Gardasil? Unlikely. :: OnThePharm — June 23, 2006 @ 11:05 pm
fyi, Merck's online Gardasil (unbranded) "Tell Someone" ads here –
Merck Gardasil "Tell Someone" 728×90 ad
Comment by adverlicious — July 1, 2006 @ 1:55 am
[...] I've covered the approval of Merck's HPV vaccine extensively in the last month or so. It's great news for women everywhere, both here in the United States, and especially in the third world. The question now is "should it be mandatory?" Of course ACIP recommended the vaccine, as I predicted they would, so it's certainly something to consider. [...]
Pingback by Should the HPV vaccine be mandatory? :: OnThePharm — July 23, 2006 @ 2:27 pm