<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lipitor: better than the rest of the statins? Not so fast.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthepharm.net/2006/08/lipitor-better-than-the-rest-of-the-statins-not-so-fast.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthepharm.net/2006/08/lipitor-better-than-the-rest-of-the-statins-not-so-fast.html</link>
	<description>Life on the pharm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheska</title>
		<link>http://onthepharm.net/2006/08/lipitor-better-than-the-rest-of-the-statins-not-so-fast.html/comment-page-1#comment-184362</link>
		<dc:creator>cheska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthepharm.net/2006/08/lipitor-better-than-the-rest-of-the-statins-not-so-fast.html#comment-184362</guid>
		<description>my dad used lipitor. i think it is ok. we ordered it in www.medsheaven.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my dad used lipitor. i think it is ok. we ordered it in <a href="http://www.medsheaven.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.medsheaven.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJS</title>
		<link>http://onthepharm.net/2006/08/lipitor-better-than-the-rest-of-the-statins-not-so-fast.html/comment-page-1#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>RJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthepharm.net/2006/08/lipitor-better-than-the-rest-of-the-statins-not-so-fast.html#comment-543</guid>
		<description>QD = Quaque Die (daily)
OD = oculus dexter (Latin for right eye)
QID = quater in die (4x/day)
TID = ter in die (3x/day)

q by itself means every.

So for instance, on a prescription:

&lt;code&gt;2 gtts od q4 x7d&lt;/code&gt;

would translate to &quot;Instill 2 drops into right eye every 4 hours for 7 days&quot;

AFAIK, pharmacy abbreviations are the same in the UK, but I could be wrong.

And I agree with you on the head-to-head studies. Because big pharmaceutical companies are the ones that typically fund clinical studies, they have no incentive to do this because it could jeopardize a product&#039;s saleability. The result is &quot;me-too&quot; drugs -- which only makes sense from a business standpoint -- and formularies with preferred drugs.

I don&#039;t know how the Aussie system works (are you all socialized down there?), but up here limiting drug approvals would never fly because of our free-wheeling system. It would be nice to have an index of sorts to see how well one drug compares to another of the same class. But again, that will never happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QD = Quaque Die (daily)<br />
OD = oculus dexter (Latin for right eye)<br />
QID = quater in die (4x/day)<br />
TID = ter in die (3x/day)</p>
<p>q by itself means every.</p>
<p>So for instance, on a prescription:</p>
<p><code>2 gtts od q4 x7d</code></p>
<p>would translate to &#034;Instill 2 drops into right eye every 4 hours for 7 days&#034;</p>
<p>AFAIK, pharmacy abbreviations are the same in the UK, but I could be wrong.</p>
<p>And I agree with you on the head-to-head studies. Because big pharmaceutical companies are the ones that typically fund clinical studies, they have no incentive to do this because it could jeopardize a product&#039;s saleability. The result is &#034;me-too&#034; drugs &#8212; which only makes sense from a business standpoint &#8212; and formularies with preferred drugs.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t know how the Aussie system works (are you all socialized down there?), but up here limiting drug approvals would never fly because of our free-wheeling system. It would be nice to have an index of sorts to see how well one drug compares to another of the same class. But again, that will never happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://onthepharm.net/2006/08/lipitor-better-than-the-rest-of-the-statins-not-so-fast.html/comment-page-1#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthepharm.net/2006/08/lipitor-better-than-the-rest-of-the-statins-not-so-fast.html#comment-539</guid>
		<description>I do wish regulatory authorities would require head to head studies, against current standards of care and not just accept studies against placebo. Speaking to some Australian pharmacists I think this is required down under, the result being that they only have a few ACE inhibitors on the market as compared to the 10 or more available in the UK.

I take it that QD is an abbreviation fir once daily? In the UK od is once daily and QDS or QID is four times daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do wish regulatory authorities would require head to head studies, against current standards of care and not just accept studies against placebo. Speaking to some Australian pharmacists I think this is required down under, the result being that they only have a few ACE inhibitors on the market as compared to the 10 or more available in the UK.</p>
<p>I take it that QD is an abbreviation fir once daily? In the UK od is once daily and QDS or QID is four times daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->