http://onthepharm.net/2007/01/lung-cancer-spit-test.html Life on the pharm Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:44:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://onthepharm.net/2007/01/lung-cancer-spit-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-19014 RJS Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:23:23 +0000 http://onthepharm.net/2007/01/lung-cancer-spit-test.html#comment-19014 No, that's not a mistake. Statistically-speaking, most heavy smokers do not develop cancer. But that doesn't mean that the risk isn't there. No, that's not a mistake. Statistically-speaking, most heavy smokers do not develop cancer. But that doesn't mean that the risk isn't there.

]]> http://onthepharm.net/2007/01/lung-cancer-spit-test.html/comment-page-1#comment-18681 Judy O'Brien Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:31:46 +0000 http://onthepharm.net/2007/01/lung-cancer-spit-test.html#comment-18681 Good Grief! Is this a mis-statement? In this article, the last paragraph says, "Current cytology tests show the extent of cell damage, but this doesn’t correlate to lung cancer rates because MOST HEAVY SMOKERS DO NOT DEVELOP CANCER." Good Grief! Is this a mis-statement? In this article, the last paragraph says, "Current cytology tests show the extent of cell damage, but this doesn’t correlate to lung cancer rates because MOST HEAVY SMOKERS DO NOT DEVELOP CANCER."

]]>