<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And who might you be to be authorizing refills?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthepharm.net/2007/05/refill-authorization.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthepharm.net/2007/05/refill-authorization.html</link>
	<description>Life on the pharm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJS</title>
		<link>http://onthepharm.net/2007/05/refill-authorization.html/comment-page-1#comment-119779</link>
		<dc:creator>RJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthepharm.net/2007/05/refill-authorization.html#comment-119779</guid>
		<description>Paul, I agree. I saw your comments on Jim&#039;s recent blog entry, and I agree with you by and large.

In terms of liability and whatnot, it&#039;s almost senseless (from a legal and practical PoV) to go after these people if it turns out that they are responsible for a mistake. They have no assets. I suspect this is why they get a free ride &quot;in the physician&#039;s underwear.&quot;

I wish it wasn&#039;t so, though. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I agree. I saw your comments on Jim&#039;s recent blog entry, and I agree with you by and large.</p>
<p>In terms of liability and whatnot, it&#039;s almost senseless (from a legal and practical PoV) to go after these people if it turns out that they are responsible for a mistake. They have no assets. I suspect this is why they get a free ride &#034;in the physician&#039;s underwear.&#034;</p>
<p>I wish it wasn&#039;t so, though. <img src='http://onthepharm.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul T</title>
		<link>http://onthepharm.net/2007/05/refill-authorization.html/comment-page-1#comment-119759</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthepharm.net/2007/05/refill-authorization.html#comment-119759</guid>
		<description>This method of prescription refill authorization hasn&#039;t changed in more than 30 years. It was going on when I started in community pharmacy in 1978, and all of us--pharmacists, physicians, patients, boards of pharmacy--are complicit in keeping it in place. I can see from these blogs that it is universal in time and space in these United States. But I have never liked the idea that unqualified people are authorizing these refills, and I want them to share in our accountability by being licensed. Here we are, getting ourselves tagged on pharmacy board Web sites and newsletters for dispensing errors and unauthorized refills, and these people are successfully flying under the radar by being able to ride it out, as it were,in the physician&#039;s underwear, a kind of legal penumbral zone. Time for that to end! Our technicians have to be licensed. Why not the &quot;authorized physicians&#039; agent,&quot; too? They are as much a part of the drug review process as any of us, and they simply cannot be allowed to continue doing what they do without recourse. Really---the doctor isn&#039;t really &quot;there&quot; at the moment of contact. Who are they kidding? They are practicing medicine without a license. It is time that they practice a new profession, that of &quot;physician agency.&quot; Let them enjoy their place in the audit trail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This method of prescription refill authorization hasn&#039;t changed in more than 30 years. It was going on when I started in community pharmacy in 1978, and all of us&#8211;pharmacists, physicians, patients, boards of pharmacy&#8211;are complicit in keeping it in place. I can see from these blogs that it is universal in time and space in these United States. But I have never liked the idea that unqualified people are authorizing these refills, and I want them to share in our accountability by being licensed. Here we are, getting ourselves tagged on pharmacy board Web sites and newsletters for dispensing errors and unauthorized refills, and these people are successfully flying under the radar by being able to ride it out, as it were,in the physician&#039;s underwear, a kind of legal penumbral zone. Time for that to end! Our technicians have to be licensed. Why not the &#034;authorized physicians&#039; agent,&#034; too? They are as much a part of the drug review process as any of us, and they simply cannot be allowed to continue doing what they do without recourse. Really&#8212;the doctor isn&#039;t really &#034;there&#034; at the moment of contact. Who are they kidding? They are practicing medicine without a license. It is time that they practice a new profession, that of &#034;physician agency.&#034; Let them enjoy their place in the audit trail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://onthepharm.net/2007/05/refill-authorization.html/comment-page-1#comment-85129</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 00:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthepharm.net/2007/05/refill-authorization.html#comment-85129</guid>
		<description>1. have read your posts regarding prescription refills
2. there are truly legitimate concerns about this system
3. have u considered raising your concerns to your parent retail pharmaceutical industry?
4. i do not know how this system of &quot;convenience&quot; and &quot;courtesy&quot; came about and evolved; but these slogans are generic to the retail industry looking to generate business from more customers who would find refilling prescriptions by way of the pharmacy, rather than the doctors clinic convenient
5. convenient, illness, disease could hardly be on a process together
6. if you are truly looking for a &quot;black box method&quot; to prescription refills, demand a classically legitimate prescription borne out of a patient&#039;s visit with the doctor
7. #6 can start with retail pharmacies stopping to offer &quot;electronic/automated refills&quot; advertised especially by big chains; this is not much different from DTC advertising, which also do not translate to rational patient care
8. what do you think about voicing your concerns to your pharmacy headquarters in the northeast?
thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. have read your posts regarding prescription refills<br />
2. there are truly legitimate concerns about this system<br />
3. have u considered raising your concerns to your parent retail pharmaceutical industry?<br />
4. i do not know how this system of &#034;convenience&#034; and &#034;courtesy&#034; came about and evolved; but these slogans are generic to the retail industry looking to generate business from more customers who would find refilling prescriptions by way of the pharmacy, rather than the doctors clinic convenient<br />
5. convenient, illness, disease could hardly be on a process together<br />
6. if you are truly looking for a &#034;black box method&#034; to prescription refills, demand a classically legitimate prescription borne out of a patient&#039;s visit with the doctor<br />
7. #6 can start with retail pharmacies stopping to offer &#034;electronic/automated refills&#034; advertised especially by big chains; this is not much different from DTC advertising, which also do not translate to rational patient care<br />
8. what do you think about voicing your concerns to your pharmacy headquarters in the northeast?<br />
thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->